Small business protections in the Australian Consumer Law *
November 10, 2016
New laws to take effect on 12 November 2016 will extend protections against unfair contract terms to small businesses.
Under the Australian Consumer Law, a provision of a consumer contract is void if the term is unfair and the contract is a standard form contract.
The amendments intend to remedy the contractual vulnerability currently suffered by small businesses, which are often forced to accept poor terms in ‘take it or leave it’ standard form contracts. The protections will apply to small businesses which, on or after 12 November 2016, enter into or renew standard form contracts or which vary terms of existing standard form contracts.
Whether or not a contract is a standard form contract will vary depending on the circumstances. Factors to be considered include:
- if one party has all / most of the bargaining power
- if the contract was prepared prior to negotiations commencing
- if the contract was presented on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis
- if a party was given an effective opportunity to negotiate the contract terms, and
- if the terms take into account the specific characteristics of the transaction.
A contractual term will be unfair if:
- it would cause a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations
- it is not reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the advantaged party, and
- it would cause detriment to a party if the term was to be applied or relied on.
Whether or not a contractual term is unfair may depend on the extent to which the term is clearly expressed and readily available to any party affected by it.
Examples of unfair terms include provisions which permit one party (but not the other) to vary the contract, avoid performance under the contract, terminate the contract or vary the upfront price without the consent of the other party or without enabling the other party to terminate the contract.
To be eligible for protection as a small business, one of the contracting parties must employ less than 20 people and either:
- the upfront price payable under the contract does not exceed $300,000, or
- the contract duration exceeds 12 months and the upfront price payable under the contract does not exceed $1 million.
While the new laws are intended to capture transactions between businesses with unequal bargaining power, they still apply if both parties are small businesses.
Any business, whether small or not, which uses standard form contracts and contracts with small businesses should review their contracts to ensure they do not contain any unfair terms.
* An earlier version of this article appeared in the Hunter Business Review in March 2016.
Authored by: Tina van Epen, Partner – Newcastle
 Under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), ASIC has responsibility for investigating unfair contract terms for financial products and services. The new protections are also extended to small businesses entering into contracts for these products and services.
October 26, 2017
Following the introduction of the Electronic Transactions Legislation Amendment (Government Transactions) Act 2017 (NSW), important changes have been made to the…Continue reading
November 10, 2016
A frequent question for any commercial lawyer is whether a confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is worth the paper it’s written…Continue reading
October 30, 2015
As the economic worm turns and principals become increasingly nervous about entering into long term and high value contracts, many are…Continue reading